Bill wrote: > Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art?
> "Antenna here is a ..."
Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly have a QSO with him.
tom wrote: > Bill wrote: >> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art?
>> "Antenna here is a ..."
> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > have a QSO with him.
> tom > K0TAR
Hey Art!
How about a sched? You give the frequency and time. I'm good on 40m through 6.
> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > have a QSO with him.
> tom > K0TAR >>He should submit his articles for every April QST issue.
But the April articles are wrutten to appear plausible
tom wrote: > tom wrote: >> Bill wrote: >>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art?
>>> "Antenna here is a ..."
>> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical >> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't >> possibly have a QSO with him.
>> tom >> K0TAR
> Hey Art!
> How about a sched? You give the frequency and time. I'm good on 40m > through 6.
> tom > K0TAR
Aaarrrttt!! Where are you?
Let's have a nice QSO with you using you wondertenna.
Of course we will never know how it really works since you'll have to use a conventional antenna for the QSO because your wondertenna radiates like a dummy load.
> and the bafflegab we have been getting recently..
What is amazing is that you can use incorrect information to describe a patent, and no one seems to notice or care. Such as this vital tidbit of information...
Quote from United States Patent 5,625,367 "To increase the directivity of such an antenna, a parasitic reflector element, usually tuned to a frequency slightly higher than the driver resonant frequency, can be placed parallel to the driver element along the boom. For further increased directivity, one or more director elements, usually tuned to frequencies slightly lower than the driver resonant frequency, can be placed at various distances along the boom on the other side of the driver element and parallel to the driver element."
Now I don't have the degree in mechanical engineering that Art has and may have taken advantage of before he became senile and decided to venture into antenna design, but danged if something in this description just doesn't seem quite right to this semi- literate ignorant redneck. :/
I think it gives a fairly good indication of the level of attention given to the claims and descriptions offered during the patent process.
BTW, don't mind Jaroslav... That's just Art's latest trunk monkey that pops out when the red button is pushed.
> > and the bafflegab we have been getting recently..
> What is amazing is that you can use incorrect information > to describe a patent, and no one seems to notice or care. > Such as this vital tidbit of information...
> Quote from United States Patent 5,625,367 > "To increase the directivity of such an antenna, a parasitic > reflector element, usually tuned to a frequency slightly higher > than the driver resonant frequency, can be placed parallel to > the driver element along the boom. For further increased directivity, > one or more director elements, usually tuned to frequencies slightly > lower than the driver resonant frequency, can be placed at various > distances along the boom on the other side of the driver element > and parallel to the driver element."
> Now I don't have the degree in mechanical engineering that Art has > and may have taken advantage of before he became senile and > decided to venture into antenna design, but danged if something > in this description just doesn't seem quite right to this semi- > literate > ignorant redneck. :/
> I think it gives a fairly good indication of the level of attention > given > to the claims and descriptions offered during the patent process.
> BTW, don't mind Jaroslav... That's just Art's latest trunk monkey > that pops out when the red button is pushed.
There is too much consistency to Art's rantings for him to be the senile old man he pretends to be. More and more I think he is a troll. My guess is someone from the CB newsgroup that often x-posts here. If I am wrong I sincerely apologize to Art for I know I could through a blot clot and be the next person with nothing better to do all day than post the warped fantasies of my damaged mind on a newsgroup.
>> How about a sched? You give the frequency and time. I'm good on 40m >> through 6.
>> tom >> K0TAR
> Aaarrrttt!! Where are you?
> Let's have a nice QSO with you using you wondertenna.
> Of course we will never know how it really works since you'll have to > use a conventional antenna for the QSO because your wondertenna radiates > like a dummy load.
> tom > K0TAR
Well, I guess "Mister Master Antenna Designer" knows exactly how well his antennas work.
On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote:
> Bill wrote: > > Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art?
> > "Antenna here is a ..."
> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > have a QSO with him.
> tom > K0TAR
Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
jaroslav lipka wrote: > On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: >> Bill wrote: >>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? >>> "Antenna here is a ..." >> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical >> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly >> have a QSO with him.
>> tom >> K0TAR
> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
> Jaro
Larger by far than your contributions to this newsgroup. Which so far have been zero, since all you do is snipe.
> jaroslav lipka wrote: > > On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: > >> Bill wrote: > >>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? > >>> "Antenna here is a ..." > >> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > >> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > >> have a QSO with him.
> >> tom > >> K0TAR
> > Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
> > Jaro
> Larger by far than your contributions to this newsgroup. Which so far > have been zero, since all you do is snipe.
> tom > K0TAR
Large amount of cash! How much and when? Who holds the cash?
> jaroslav lipka wrote: > > On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: > >> Bill wrote: > >>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? > >>> "Antenna here is a ..." > >> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > >> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > >> have a QSO with him.
> >> tom > >> K0TAR
> > Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
> > Jaro
> Larger by far than your contributions to this newsgroup. Which so far > have been zero, since all you do is snipe.
> On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote:
> > Bill wrote: > > > Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art?
> > > "Antenna here is a ..."
> > Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > > nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > > have a QSO with him.
> > tom > > K0TAR
> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
> Jaro
I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to pay out.! They are not men or women of honour, they are losers. Look at the last 40 posts made by K0TAR and make your own decision as to what sort of idiot he is! He is not here to provide technical info in any way, just gutter talk. Was it not you that was willing to put up $1000 a year ago which I also wanted a piece of and they all ran away? As I said, they are not women of honour.
> On Mar 18, 9:50 pm, jaroslav lipka <jaroli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote:
> > > Bill wrote: > > > > Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art?
> > > > "Antenna here is a ..."
> > > Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > > > nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > > > have a QSO with him.
> > > tom > > > K0TAR
> > Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
> > Jaro
> I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the > fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to > pay out.!
I don't see what it would prove. It's a known fact that people have made contacts using dummy loads for years. I myself once had a qso using a light bulb as my antenna. I didn't apply for a patent. I knew it was prior art. :/
Art Unwin wrote: > On Mar 18, 9:50 pm, jaroslav lipka <jaroli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote:
>>> Bill wrote: >>>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? >>>> "Antenna here is a ..." >>> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical >>> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly >>> have a QSO with him. >>> tom >>> K0TAR >> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
>> Jaro
> I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the > fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to > pay out.! > They are not men or women of honour, they are losers. > Look at the last 40 posts made by K0TAR and make your own decision as > to what sort of idiot he is! He is not here to provide technical info > in any way, just gutter talk. > Was it not you that was willing to put up $1000 a year ago which I > also wanted a piece of > and they all ran away? As I said, they are not women of honour.
I did not offer to have a QSO for cash. Obviously you cannot read.
You accuse me of being dishonorable and then call me an idiot. Quite the gentleman.
You also say I offered 1000 dollars for something a year ago. You are hallucinating again.
And then you give a backhanded insult to me, and to women.
You should be quite proud of yourself.
So, as I offered several days ago, and you didn't respond to, how about a QSO on your wonder antenna?
I will require an impartial observer to give evidence that you actually use the "Faraday Shield Thingy Antenna" you think is so wonderful, since I also believe you not to be a man of honor.
> Art Unwin wrote: > > On Mar 18, 9:50 pm, jaroslav lipka <jaroli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote:
> >>> Bill wrote: > >>>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? > >>>> "Antenna here is a ..." > >>> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > >>> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > >>> have a QSO with him. > >>> tom > >>> K0TAR > >> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash?
> >> Jaro
> > I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the > > fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to > > pay out.! > > They are not men or women of honour, they are losers. > > Look at the last 40 posts made by K0TAR and make your own decision as > > to what sort of idiot he is! He is not here to provide technical info > > in any way, just gutter talk. > > Was it not you that was willing to put up $1000 a year ago which I > > also wanted a piece of > > and they all ran away? As I said, they are not women of honour.
> I did not offer to have a QSO for cash. Obviously you cannot read.
> You accuse me of being dishonorable and then call me an idiot. Quite > the gentleman.
> You also say I offered 1000 dollars for something a year ago. You are > hallucinating again.
> And then you give a backhanded insult to me, and to women.
> You should be quite proud of yourself.
> So, as I offered several days ago, and you didn't respond to, how about > a QSO on your wonder antenna?
> I will require an impartial observer to give evidence that you actually > use the "Faraday Shield Thingy Antenna" you think is so wonderful, since > I also believe you not to be a man of honor.
> tom > K0TAR
wriggle---wriggle
Re-read your first post on this thread, quote "I would wager large amounts of cash"
jaroslav lipka wrote: > On Mar 20, 8:54 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: >> Art Unwin wrote: >>> On Mar 18, 9:50 pm, jaroslav lipka <jaroli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: >>>>> Bill wrote: >>>>>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? >>>>>> "Antenna here is a ..." >>>>> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical >>>>> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly >>>>> have a QSO with him. >>>>> tom >>>>> K0TAR >>>> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash? >>>> Jaro >>> I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the >>> fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to >>> pay out.! >>> They are not men or women of honour, they are losers. >>> Look at the last 40 posts made by K0TAR and make your own decision as >>> to what sort of idiot he is! He is not here to provide technical info >>> in any way, just gutter talk. >>> Was it not you that was willing to put up $1000 a year ago which I >>> also wanted a piece of >>> and they all ran away? As I said, they are not women of honour. >> I did not offer to have a QSO for cash. Obviously you cannot read.
>> You accuse me of being dishonorable and then call me an idiot. Quite >> the gentleman.
>> You also say I offered 1000 dollars for something a year ago. You are >> hallucinating again.
>> And then you give a backhanded insult to me, and to women.
>> You should be quite proud of yourself.
>> So, as I offered several days ago, and you didn't respond to, how about >> a QSO on your wonder antenna?
>> I will require an impartial observer to give evidence that you actually >> use the "Faraday Shield Thingy Antenna" you think is so wonderful, since >> I also believe you not to be a man of honor.
>> tom >> K0TAR
> wriggle---wriggle
> Re-read your first post on this thread, > quote "I would wager large amounts of cash"
> Jaro
Jaro.
Please reread all of what was in the posted sequence you are referencing. Exactly what I wrote is near the top end of what is in this very message.
I never offered anything to Art, I wagered that others would not be able to have a QSO with him. Implying that they wouldn't be able to hear him if that helps you understand.
> jaroslav lipka wrote: > > On Mar 20, 8:54 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: > >> Art Unwin wrote: > >>> On Mar 18, 9:50 pm, jaroslav lipka <jaroli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: > >>>>> Bill wrote: > >>>>>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? > >>>>>> "Antenna here is a ..." > >>>>> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical > >>>>> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly > >>>>> have a QSO with him. > >>>>> tom > >>>>> K0TAR > >>>> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash? > >>>> Jaro > >>> I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the > >>> fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to > >>> pay out.! > >>> They are not men or women of honour, they are losers. > >>> Look at the last 40 posts made by K0TAR and make your own decision as > >>> to what sort of idiot he is! He is not here to provide technical info > >>> in any way, just gutter talk. > >>> Was it not you that was willing to put up $1000 a year ago which I > >>> also wanted a piece of > >>> and they all ran away? As I said, they are not women of honour. > >> I did not offer to have a QSO for cash. Obviously you cannot read.
> >> You accuse me of being dishonorable and then call me an idiot. Quite > >> the gentleman.
> >> You also say I offered 1000 dollars for something a year ago. You are > >> hallucinating again.
> >> And then you give a backhanded insult to me, and to women.
> >> You should be quite proud of yourself.
> >> So, as I offered several days ago, and you didn't respond to, how about > >> a QSO on your wonder antenna?
> >> I will require an impartial observer to give evidence that you actually > >> use the "Faraday Shield Thingy Antenna" you think is so wonderful, since > >> I also believe you not to be a man of honor.
> >> tom > >> K0TAR
> > wriggle---wriggle
> > Re-read your first post on this thread, > > quote "I would wager large amounts of cash"
> > Jaro
> Jaro.
> Please reread all of what was in the posted sequence you are > referencing. Exactly what I wrote is near the top end of what is in > this very message.
> I never offered anything to Art, I wagered that others would not be able > to have a QSO with him. Implying that they wouldn't be able to hear him > if that helps you understand.
> tom > K0TAR
quote "I would wager large amounts of cash you couldn't possibly have a QSO with him"
I ask again how much is your large amount of cash?
jaroslav lipka wrote: > On Mar 20, 9:37 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: >> jaroslav lipka wrote: >>> On Mar 20, 8:54 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: >>>> Art Unwin wrote: >>>>> On Mar 18, 9:50 pm, jaroslav lipka <jaroli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Mar 14, 11:38 am, tom <news4...@taring.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Bill wrote: >>>>>>>> Has anybody ever had a QSL with Art? >>>>>>>> "Antenna here is a ..." >>>>>>> Based on his "designs", which don't seem to exist except as whimsical >>>>>>> nonsense, I would wager large amounts of cash that you couldn't possibly >>>>>>> have a QSO with him. >>>>>>> tom >>>>>>> K0TAR >>>>>> Purely as a matter of interest how much is your large amount of cash? >>>>>> Jaro >>>>> I would have a qso with anybody for a large amount of cash but the >>>>> fact is when they hear me they would not answer so they don't have to >>>>> pay out.! >>>>> They are not men or women of honour, they are losers. >>>>> Look at the last 40 posts made by K0TAR and make your own decision as >>>>> to what sort of idiot he is! He is not here to provide technical info >>>>> in any way, just gutter talk. >>>>> Was it not you that was willing to put up $1000 a year ago which I >>>>> also wanted a piece of >>>>> and they all ran away? As I said, they are not women of honour. >>>> I did not offer to have a QSO for cash. Obviously you cannot read. >>>> You accuse me of being dishonorable and then call me an idiot. Quite >>>> the gentleman. >>>> You also say I offered 1000 dollars for something a year ago. You are >>>> hallucinating again. >>>> And then you give a backhanded insult to me, and to women. >>>> You should be quite proud of yourself. >>>> So, as I offered several days ago, and you didn't respond to, how about >>>> a QSO on your wonder antenna? >>>> I will require an impartial observer to give evidence that you actually >>>> use the "Faraday Shield Thingy Antenna" you think is so wonderful, since >>>> I also believe you not to be a man of honor. >>>> tom >>>> K0TAR >>> wriggle---wriggle >>> Re-read your first post on this thread, >>> quote "I would wager large amounts of cash" >>> Jaro >> Jaro.
>> Please reread all of what was in the posted sequence you are >> referencing. Exactly what I wrote is near the top end of what is in >> this very message.
>> I never offered anything to Art, I wagered that others would not be able >> to have a QSO with him. Implying that they wouldn't be able to hear him >> if that helps you understand.
>> tom >> K0TAR
> quote "I would wager large amounts of cash you couldn't > possibly > have a QSO with him"
> I ask again how much is your large amount of cash?
> Jaro
GOAT
If you don't know what that means I would suggest using google.
|
